<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Dev Review: Mackie Onyx Blackjack Interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roulette</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-15620</link>
		<dc:creator>Roulette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-15620</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really a nice and helpful piece of information. I&#039;m glad that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really a nice and helpful piece of information. I&#8217;m glad that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackjack</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-15619</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-15619</guid>
		<description>I do accept as true with all of the concepts you&#039;ve introduced to your post. They&#039;re really convincing and can definitely work. Nonetheless, the posts are very short for novices. May you please lengthen them a little from next time? Thank you for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do accept as true with all of the concepts you&#8217;ve introduced to your post. They&#8217;re really convincing and can definitely work. Nonetheless, the posts are very short for novices. May you please lengthen them a little from next time? Thank you for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy c</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-15198</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-15198</guid>
		<description>I bought it! And it is really everything you could want at this price point. It truly is better than all of my other dac/headamps at a similar price-point. 5t would be interesting to see how much more you&#039;d have to spend to get a better just a standalone DAC, standalone HeadAmp, pre-amp etc. 

thanks again,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought it! And it is really everything you could want at this price point. It truly is better than all of my other dac/headamps at a similar price-point. 5t would be interesting to see how much more you&#8217;d have to spend to get a better just a standalone DAC, standalone HeadAmp, pre-amp etc. </p>
<p>thanks again,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feki</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-15109</link>
		<dc:creator>Feki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-15109</guid>
		<description>BlackJack no funktion driver w7  !!!  ASIAO4LL - OK  It is a shame Micke :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BlackJack no funktion driver w7  !!!  ASIAO4LL &#8211; OK  It is a shame Micke <img src='http://www.proaudiostar.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-13981</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 00:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-13981</guid>
		<description>Mackie Onyx vs Scarlett 2i2 shootout is in the works!  Stay tuned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mackie Onyx vs Scarlett 2i2 shootout is in the works!  Stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc J</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-13405</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-13405</guid>
		<description>Lets compare mackie blackjack the focusrite scarlett 2i2 and the tc electronic desktop konnekt 6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets compare mackie blackjack the focusrite scarlett 2i2 and the tc electronic desktop konnekt 6</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc J</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-13360</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-13360</guid>
		<description>Yea!! Dev Im also torn between the mackie blackjack and the focusrite scarlett 2i2 Im interested in the pres, converters and stability Im on a 08 non unibody macbook pro 2.4 6gb of ram i need an honest comparison</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea!! Dev Im also torn between the mackie blackjack and the focusrite scarlett 2i2 Im interested in the pres, converters and stability Im on a 08 non unibody macbook pro 2.4 6gb of ram i need an honest comparison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Wu</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-13126</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-13126</guid>
		<description>Mackie Blackjack versus Focusrite Scarlett 2i2.  What would you recommend Dev?  I think the preamps are the most important to me if everything else is equal.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mackie Blackjack versus Focusrite Scarlett 2i2.  What would you recommend Dev?  I think the preamps are the most important to me if everything else is equal.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-11373</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-11373</guid>
		<description>To answer your question Jimmy, in a nutshell, if you want a DAC/AMP combo, the Blackjack is easily the best one I can think of at the price, bar none.  It&#039;s a fantastic piece of gear for what it costs, and well worth the price of admission just as a DAC/Pre/HPA (the headphone amp is FANTASTIC for a buss-powered built in, better than some standalone headamps I&#039;ve heard, I don&#039;t know why they don&#039;t advertise it more.  As a point of reference, it will push my K702s and HD-600s without breaking a sweat).  As far as the preamp phantom power issue, I hadn&#039;t heard that before, and for what it&#039;s worth, I&#039;ve never had issues.  Do you have a specific failing to point to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer your question Jimmy, in a nutshell, if you want a DAC/AMP combo, the Blackjack is easily the best one I can think of at the price, bar none.  It&#8217;s a fantastic piece of gear for what it costs, and well worth the price of admission just as a DAC/Pre/HPA (the headphone amp is FANTASTIC for a buss-powered built in, better than some standalone headamps I&#8217;ve heard, I don&#8217;t know why they don&#8217;t advertise it more.  As a point of reference, it will push my K702s and HD-600s without breaking a sweat).  As far as the preamp phantom power issue, I hadn&#8217;t heard that before, and for what it&#8217;s worth, I&#8217;ve never had issues.  Do you have a specific failing to point to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy c</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-10717</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-10717</guid>
		<description>Can anyone think of a better item (in this price range) if I was to use this for just USB/DAC to headphones/monitors? I don&#039;t need the recording capabilities. 

Thank you ahead of time! 

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone think of a better item (in this price range) if I was to use this for just USB/DAC to headphones/monitors? I don&#8217;t need the recording capabilities. </p>
<p>Thank you ahead of time! </p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proaudio</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-10546</link>
		<dc:creator>proaudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-10546</guid>
		<description>Blackjack seems to have a hardware problem related to the preamp&#039;s phantom power. It will reject certain types of condenser microphones, by introducing an extremely high amount of noise into recording. 
Beware!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blackjack seems to have a hardware problem related to the preamp&#8217;s phantom power. It will reject certain types of condenser microphones, by introducing an extremely high amount of noise into recording.<br />
Beware!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy c</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-10442</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-10442</guid>
		<description>Hi Dav - I&#039;ve just recently stumbled across your site here and am really impressed! I especially like the bottom line/brooklyn minute video. 

One quickie - if I was looking for a headphone amp/USB DAC with potential to run a pair of studio monitors out of it would this be ideal? I don&#039;t need to record at all - simply listen to music (headphone and monitors). Thanks a million! 

If there is better (BabyFace?) and it&#039;s worth it (just for conversion and playback) then please suggest. Otherwise I&#039;ll go for it! 

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dav &#8211; I&#8217;ve just recently stumbled across your site here and am really impressed! I especially like the bottom line/brooklyn minute video. </p>
<p>One quickie &#8211; if I was looking for a headphone amp/USB DAC with potential to run a pair of studio monitors out of it would this be ideal? I don&#8217;t need to record at all &#8211; simply listen to music (headphone and monitors). Thanks a million! </p>
<p>If there is better (BabyFace?) and it&#8217;s worth it (just for conversion and playback) then please suggest. Otherwise I&#8217;ll go for it! </p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-6771</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-6771</guid>
		<description>I personally like the pres better, though the Apogee Duet pres are really fantastic in their own right, very open and detailed.  The Onyx pres just have a little more character to them, their a little warmer, a little richer.  The Duet&#039;s converters are definitely a cut above, but that&#039;s to be expected.  Basically I&#039;d say, all in all, if you want to spend Duet level money on a portable interface, save up a little more and buy the RME Babyface (which I&#039;m in the process of reviewing right now).  Not to ruin the surprise, but it&#039;s a showstopper.  But if Pro Audio Star is giving these away for 150 a pop right now, that&#039;s an absurd deal.  You could buy three and have money left over for lunch vs buying a Duet, and it&#039;s definitely a real competitor as far as I&#039;m concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like the pres better, though the Apogee Duet pres are really fantastic in their own right, very open and detailed.  The Onyx pres just have a little more character to them, their a little warmer, a little richer.  The Duet&#8217;s converters are definitely a cut above, but that&#8217;s to be expected.  Basically I&#8217;d say, all in all, if you want to spend Duet level money on a portable interface, save up a little more and buy the RME Babyface (which I&#8217;m in the process of reviewing right now).  Not to ruin the surprise, but it&#8217;s a showstopper.  But if Pro Audio Star is giving these away for 150 a pop right now, that&#8217;s an absurd deal.  You could buy three and have money left over for lunch vs buying a Duet, and it&#8217;s definitely a real competitor as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stockhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-6321</link>
		<dc:creator>stockhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-6321</guid>
		<description>hi dev, the test is great.
what do you think, the sound quality of mackie blackjack (mic pres, ect.) beat the level of apogee one?
thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi dev, the test is great.<br />
what do you think, the sound quality of mackie blackjack (mic pres, ect.) beat the level of apogee one?<br />
thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-6149</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-6149</guid>
		<description>Ok, so Mackie has universal drivers that should solve the ASIO issues, here&#039;s the link: http://downloads.mackie.com/drivers/digital_audio/V1.9%20Mackie%20Universal%20Driver%20and%20Installation%20Instructions.zip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so Mackie has universal drivers that should solve the ASIO issues, here&#8217;s the link: <a href="http://downloads.mackie.com/drivers/digital_audio/V1.9%20Mackie%20Universal%20Driver%20and%20Installation%20Instructions.zip" rel="nofollow">http://downloads.mackie.com/drivers/digital_audio/V1.9%20Mackie%20Universal%20Driver%20and%20Installation%20Instructions.zip</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-5731</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-5731</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have to look into the ASIO issues; my tests were done using a Mac and Logic, so I didn&#039;t run into those.  Thanks for the head&#039;s up on that folk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have to look into the ASIO issues; my tests were done using a Mac and Logic, so I didn&#8217;t run into those.  Thanks for the head&#8217;s up on that folk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlesvk</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-5491</link>
		<dc:creator>charlesvk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-5491</guid>
		<description>Yeah, same here. I can make a clean recording with it, but there´s just no way I can listen back through the Blackjack, not even with the buffer setting at 1024!

They´ve got to fix it (unless there´s something I don´t get)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, same here. I can make a clean recording with it, but there´s just no way I can listen back through the Blackjack, not even with the buffer setting at 1024!</p>
<p>They´ve got to fix it (unless there´s something I don´t get)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miendez</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-4883</link>
		<dc:creator>Miendez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-4883</guid>
		<description>I recently purchased a Mackie Onyx Blackjack what is happening with the driver Mackie I&#039;m experiencing the same driver problem that many people! simply do not work! I tried on different pcs mackie is worth repairing the driver problem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently purchased a Mackie Onyx Blackjack what is happening with the driver Mackie I&#8217;m experiencing the same driver problem that many people! simply do not work! I tried on different pcs mackie is worth repairing the driver problem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.proaudiostar.com/in-dev-review-mackie-blackjack-interface/comment-page-1#comment-4682</link>
		<dc:creator>pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 18:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proaudiostar.com/?p=1769#comment-4682</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great test.

I have the BlackJack and I am very satisfied with the sound, although I have not alot of comparison. Maybe the RME babyface would certainly be a good solution (three times more expensive).

The ASIO driver of the bj is a disaster. I have to use ASIO4ALL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great test.</p>
<p>I have the BlackJack and I am very satisfied with the sound, although I have not alot of comparison. Maybe the RME babyface would certainly be a good solution (three times more expensive).</p>
<p>The ASIO driver of the bj is a disaster. I have to use ASIO4ALL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
